DAVID AND GOLIATH BREACH OF CONTRACT FRAUD CASE ALREADY FILED AGAINST DEUTSCHE BANK AND BENCHMARK MORTGAGE

This is a David and Goliath case. This is a breach of contract, common law fraud, and civil theft, fraudulent lien case brought in District Court in Texas. The claims against the defendants arise out of the contracts and tort.

The defendants are Deutsche Bank and Arklatex Benchmark Mortgage who is ranked 51st largest mortgage loan originator. Arklatex ’s annual turnover is $250,000,00m USD. The basis of the claim is defendants perpetuating and engaging in an illegal course of fraudulent conduct by failing to comply with the terms of the deed of trust and notes. Defendant Mortgagee Arklatex sold its interest in the property and did not release that interest under the terms of the deed of trust. This defendant has made a judicial admission that it did not release its lien. This 100% clear and 100% recovery of all attorney’s fees and damages in this case for breach of contract. Defendant Deutsche did not have an interest in the property. Defendant fraudulently foreclosed on the property assigning a lien to itself. We have an injunction to stop defendants from filing the liens which it violated. We have a finding that the liens are fraudulent. We have motions before the court in August of 2016 to set a show cause hearing for October. Defendants Deutsche maintained dominion over the property using the fraudulent assignments. Demand was made and defendant refused to release. Under Penal Code § 32.46— this act shows intent to defraud and harm. This violates the TXCPRC 12.002 and the DTPA. b. A person may not make, present, or use a document or other record with: i. Knowledge that the document or other record is a fraudulent Court record or a fraudulent lien or claim against real or personal property or an interest in real or personal property;

ii. intent that the document or other record be given the same legal effect as a Court record or document of a Court created by or established under the constitution or laws of this state or the United States or another entity listed in Section 37.01, Penal Code, The defendants sought to cover up these failures through forgery of documents and fraud by concealment.

The damage claims center on loss of employment earnings, hurricane damages, maintenance costs and loss of sales on the property. Several claims include potential criminal violations for fraudulent liens and fraudulent misrepresentation, busting the damage caps for exemplary damages.

This is a documents case containing extensive documentary evidence in support of the Plaintiffs claims. The statute of limitations to collect on the notes by the defendants expired in 2011. There are no counterclaims. The breach of contract and wrongful foreclosure is set for no evidence summary judgment in October/Nov 2016. We intend to continue to file no evidence summary judgments and set a trial for damages once these are complete.

Legal team includes:

35 year experienced trial lawyer and former federal prosecutor, former in house trial counsel for Federal Express, former Navy trial lawyer, experienced in complex civil and criminal litigation, including commercial, intellectual property and employment litigation as well as civil and criminal racketeering, fraud, tax fraud and insider trading. Counsel has expertise in trying ,winning and settling this type of case.

Co-counsel: two decades of experience with real estate, issues who knows and has worked with the judge. Has experience in winning and settling these types of cases.

Judge and Jurisdiction: very experienced and sophisticated judge who was a local real estate attorney practicing with co-counsel for 15 years before becoming the judge. Judge pro plaintiff in cases where the judge feels Plaintiff has been burned.

Judge has recently denied def. motion to dismiss and struck defences and pleadings impairing defendants defences.

We anticipate this case will settle within the next 6-8 months.

Jurisdiction: Jury very pro plaintiff and awards very large damages where fraud personal injury damages have been wronged against Plaintiffs. This Texas County is a jurisdictional choice for large multi-district tort claims.

Damage expert witnesses identified.

We have an opinion letter of counsel with a 80% or better chance of recovery.

Defendants are liquid banks with ability to pay large damages.

Arklatex has made a diminimus settlement offer.

We are offering a % of amount raised for the investment effort ONLY. A total amount of return on your investment is 300%. Should the case settle early or we recover attorney’s fees at an earlier stage in the litigation (i.e. within 4-6 months) your investment return will be less than 300% and made on an attractive ROI.

Disclosures: This is a consolidation of two cases. The first case filed has had several previous attorneys work on it who have resigned. This was due to the increasing complexity in the case and increasing damages.. Previous attorneys were plaintiff’s personal injury attorneys with varying degree of skill for complex litigation. The second case filed had the same attorney until April of 2016. Recent new counsel has been retained with the expertise to take this case to trial. There are no liens on this case.

About the plaintiff: Plaintiff is a 59 year old American lady from Texas. She was working as a corporate finance advisor for a boutique investment bank at the time this occurred. The Plaintiff was a regulated investment banker holding a CF30 banking license where she had worked for 12 years. She had reached a reasonable amount of success in her career over the years earning a mid 6 figure salary. The litigation, loss of the property in a hurricane caused financial soundness issues from having to engage in US litigation. This long running litigation seriously impeded the plaintiff ability to earn a living, and includes loss of her banking license. This is a result of the litigation and its related issues caused the plaintiff to be unqualified to maintain her licence. She is currently working straight commission in an unregulated capacity at a broker dealer. She lives in a homeless shelter which she will shortly have to move from.

Plaintiff is very credible, resourceful, determined, and persistent. She has utilized her banking, regulatory and legal relationships to progress this case. At times she has represented herself, winning several cutting edge motions against the Defendants for Fraud. The plaintiff has invested her savings and 1000s of hours in the case to date. She became an expert witness for the Texas attorney general during the financial crises, assisting with gathering documentation that evidences the massive fraud in the mortgage industry during that time. The attorney general recovered $450 million for Texas as a result of her assistance.

These funds are greatly needed to make a good faith effort to pay new current counsel, and for living expenses and other bills.

clause23 submitted this post on 08/20/2016.

You can contact clause23 privately at https://www.invest4justice.com/members/clause23/profile

Sign up for Invest4Justice today!

International arbitration case analysis is provided to Invest4Justice by the lawyers of the International Arbitration Attorney Network. All other legal advice is provided by the Aceris law firm.

DAVID AND GOLIATH BREACH OF CONTRACT FRAUD CASE ALREADY FILED AGAINST DEUTSCHE BANK AND BENCHMARK MORTGAGE

The lawyer Robert Helfend has just been reviewed on Invest4Justice

The lawyer Robert Helfend has just been reviewed on Invest4Justice.

The review indicates:

Lawyer's Name   Robert Helfend Overall Rating   10 Hourly Legal Fees You Paid (USD)   300-400 Country Where Lawyer Practices Law   United States Lawyer's Practice Area   Criminal law Lawyer's Website Or Linkedin Profile   http://www.robertmhelfend.com/ Email Address Of Lawyer   shannon.jeffrey.d@gmail.com Comments   Best lawyer ever. Very professional and you can tell right away that he understands your situation. Role   Lawyer

The lawyer Robert Helfend has just been reviewed on Invest4Justice

Estimated 428.57% Returns: IRS WHISTLEBLOWER BEST CASE IN USA

Description Of Legal Dispute

Went to the IRS and reported $56M tax fraud in 2008. In 2012 this resulted in arrests and prosecution from the US Government. Now the government will pay a portion of the money too me now that the criminal case is over they start with the civil case. My attorney estimates we will get a around $5M I am seeking $350,000 and will pay back 6x on investment. I have an attorney who is a tax attorney who calls this case “one of the best whistleblower cases ever”. I have 126 pages of supporting documents stamped by IRS.

Username   Empire36 E-mail Address   bb@goempirewine.com Country Where Your Dispute Is Located   United States How Much Litigation Funding Do You Want To Raise?   $350,000.00 Headline For Your Litigation Crowdfunding Campaign   IRS WHISTLEBLOWER BEST CASE IN USA Description Of Your Legal Dispute   Went to the IRS and reported $56M tax fraud in 2008. In 2012 this resulted in arrests and prosecution from the US Government. Now the government will pay a portion of the money too me now that the criminal case is over they start with the civil case. My attorney estimates we will get a around $5M I am seeking $350,000 and will pay back 6x on investment. I have an attorney who is a tax attorney who calls this case “one of the best whistleblower cases ever”. I have 126 pages of supporting documents stamped by IRS. Featured Image For Your Litigation Funding Campaign   End Date Of Your Litigation Crowdfunding Campaign   2016-09-30 How Much Compensation Can You Receive If Your Case Wins?   $5,000,000.00 Percentage Of Future Potential Compensation You Are Offering As A Reward (Success Fee / Contingent Fee)   30% Of Amount Recovered AUTOMATIC CALCULATIONS Potential Return Of Investors (Percent)   428.57 Estimated Total Reward Offered To Investors   $1,500,000.00 Estimated Remaining Compensation For Litigant   $3,500,000.00 Role   Litigant

---

 

International arbitration case analysis is provided to Invest4Justice by the lawyers of the International Arbitration Attorney Network. All other legal advice is provided by Aceris Law LLC.

Estimated 428.57% Returns: IRS WHISTLEBLOWER BEST CASE IN USA

Compensation for an unjustified guardianship against a victim of harassment

GET A NEW INCOME, lucrative and simple investments for just causes, accessible to small savers.

With judiciary crowdfunding, help people finance their case to obtain justice, and get a share in their gains in return.

One case in two is succeeding. In case of failure, you recieve nothing. Investing a small sum in 4 cases, you have 93.75% chances to gain a return; investing in 8 cases, it increases to 99.6%.

I can show you cadditional lever ways to get a regular income this way..

Near 400% return. Victim of an unjustified guardianship in a case of aggravated harassment, it has been terminated only after six years in spite of a court decision and has completely destroyed my life. I am now asking for compensation by the State. I have excellent chances of success, because of the strengthened responsibility of the State in such cases.

Share this post, invest in my case and others, contact me via this site. Until soon, Mary.

Mary Dessing submitted this post on 08/13/2016.

You can contact Mary Dessing privately at https://www.invest4justice.com/members/Mary Dessing/profile

Sign up for Invest4Justice today!

International arbitration case analysis is provided to Invest4Justice by the lawyers of the International Arbitration Attorney Network. All other legal advice is provided by the Aceris law firm.

Compensation for an unjustified guardianship against a victim of harassment

Estimated 500% Returns: SEC COVER-UP EXPOSED

Description Of Legal Dispute

Seeking funding for legal expenses and representation in a case against the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission to be brought in the U.S. Federal Court of Claims for the amount of $836,000,000.00.

This case was previously submitted to the United States Supreme Court, but was denied hearing. That Sumpreme Curt brief is available for review. The case now advances to the Federal Court of Claims.

Plaintiff Richard A. Altomare, et. al. brings this action against the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) for its fraudulent failure for more than fifteen years to do its statutorily mandated duty to regulate naked short selling.

The SEC targeted and prosecuted the plaintiff for many years, and then and unjustly incarcerated him in an attempt to silence him as the most prominent whistle-blower against naked short selling and the SEC’s malfeasances.

These SEC actions to silence the plaintiff deprived him of his freedom of speech, life, liberty, property, contractual rights, reputation, business positions and future endeavors in violation of the First and Fifth Amendments of the United States Constitution.

This Court has jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 1491.

This case involves the failure of the SEC to stop naked short selling and to expose SEC agents who destroyed Universal Express and the plaintiff, Mr. Richard A. Altomare, its President and CEO, and thousands of other middle-class, Main Street small publicly-traded companies, resulting in the loss of billions of dollars of the life savings of small investors and the loss of tens of thousands of jobs.

Despite the efforts of the plaintiff, SEC administrations have failed for more than fifteen years to take any effective regulatory or enforcement action against naked short selling or the naked shorters themselves.

Congress mandated in Section 17(a) of the Exchange Act that the SEC has the duty to assure “The prompt and accurate clearance and settlement of securities transactions… necessary for the protection of investors…” i.e. the duty of the SEC under the law to prevent and stop the naked short selling of shares.

The failure to regulate and the failure to enforce naked shorting statutes and rules by the SEC borders on criminality, cover-up and conspiracy.

Naked short selling is selling shares one does not own and will never purchase or deliver.

These are non-existent, unregistered and counterfeit shares not issued by the companies in whose names they are sold. The SEC, however, is paid a fee for each such share sold.

Each such sale is an illegal violation of the securities statutes as the sale of unregistered securities and a violation of the anti-counterfeiting statutes of the United States, 18 U.S.C. Sections 513, 514.

Naked short selling is grand larceny under the laws of every State.

The SEC denied and ignored frequently requested assistance by the plaintiff to combat the naked shorting of his Company’s shares.

The SEC denied that naked short selling existed or was a problem.

The SEC after more than fifteen years still denies the existence of this national scandal.

The long-term naked shorting scandal by Wall Street firms of the shares of small public companies destroyed thousands of those companies and the investments of millions of American investors, including over 65,000 Universal Express shareholders.

This will be the primary investment funding traunche sought for the case. While the total possible compensation in this case may be as high as $836,000,000.00, we are offering compensation to investors in this crowd funding raise as A PERCENTAGE OF THE AMOUNT RAISED FOR THE INVESTMENT EFFORT. For this initial fund raising effort the total amount of $1,000,000.00 or a 500% return on the $200,000.00 investment is offered. Future crowd funding traunche efforts will offer similar returns AS A PERCENTAGE OF THE AMOUNT RAISED FOR INVESTMENT ONLY. For Attorneys that may become involved in our representation, a contingent fee as a percentage of the total compensation received may be negotiated, exclusive of returns offered for crowd funding investments.

Username   soldshort E-mail Address   info@soldshortinamerica.com Country Where Your Dispute Is Located   United States How Much Litigation Funding Do You Want To Raise?   $200,000.00 Headline For Your Litigation Crowdfunding Campaign   SEC COVER-UP EXPOSED Description Of Your Legal Dispute   Seeking funding for legal expenses and representation in a case against the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission to be brought in the U.S. Federal Court of Claims for the amount of $836,000,000.00. This case was previously submitted to the United States Supreme Court, but was denied hearing. That Sumpreme Curt brief is available for review. The case now advances to the Federal Court of Claims. Plaintiff Richard A. Altomare, et. al. brings this action against the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) for its fraudulent failure for more than fifteen years to do its statutorily mandated duty to regulate naked short selling. The SEC targeted and prosecuted the plaintiff for many years, and then and unjustly incarcerated him in an attempt to silence him as the most prominent whistle-blower against naked short selling and the SEC’s malfeasances. These SEC actions to silence the plaintiff deprived him of his freedom of speech, life, liberty, property, contractual rights, reputation, business positions and future endeavors in violation of the First and Fifth Amendments of the United States Constitution. This Court has jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 1491. This case involves the failure of the SEC to stop naked short selling and to expose SEC agents who destroyed Universal Express and the plaintiff, Mr. Richard A. Altomare, its President and CEO, and thousands of other middle-class, Main Street small publicly-traded companies, resulting in the loss of billions of dollars of the life savings of small investors and the loss of tens of thousands of jobs. Despite the efforts of the plaintiff, SEC administrations have failed for more than fifteen years to take any effective regulatory or enforcement action against naked short selling or the naked shorters themselves. Congress mandated in Section 17(a) of the Exchange Act that the SEC has the duty to assure “The prompt and accurate clearance and settlement of securities transactions… necessary for the protection of investors…” i.e. the duty of the SEC under the law to prevent and stop the naked short selling of shares. The failure to regulate and the failure to enforce naked shorting statutes and rules by the SEC borders on criminality, cover-up and conspiracy. Naked short selling is selling shares one does not own and will never purchase or deliver. These are non-existent, unregistered and counterfeit shares not issued by the companies in whose names they are sold. The SEC, however, is paid a fee for each such share sold. Each such sale is an illegal violation of the securities statutes as the sale of unregistered securities and a violation of the anti-counterfeiting statutes of the United States, 18 U.S.C. Sections 513, 514. Naked short selling is grand larceny under the laws of every State. The SEC denied and ignored frequently requested assistance by the plaintiff to combat the naked shorting of his Company’s shares. The SEC denied that naked short selling existed or was a problem. The SEC after more than fifteen years still denies the existence of this national scandal. The long-term naked shorting scandal by Wall Street firms of the shares of small public companies destroyed thousands of those companies and the investments of millions of American investors, including over 65,000 Universal Express shareholders. This will be the primary investment funding traunche sought for the case. While the total possible compensation in this case may be as high as $836,000,000.00, we are offering compensation to investors in this crowd funding raise as A PERCENTAGE OF THE AMOUNT RAISED FOR THE INVESTMENT EFFORT. For this initial fund raising effort the total amount of $1,000,000.00 or a 500% return on the $200,000.00 investment is offered. Future crowd funding traunche efforts will offer similar returns AS A PERCENTAGE OF THE AMOUNT RAISED FOR INVESTMENT ONLY. For Attorneys that may become involved in our representation, a contingent fee as a percentage of the total compensation received may be negotiated, exclusive of returns offered for crowd funding investments. Featured Image For Your Litigation Funding Campaign   End Date Of Your Litigation Crowdfunding Campaign   2016-09-30 How Much Compensation Can You Receive If Your Case Wins?   $5,000,000.00 Percentage Of Future Potential Compensation You Are Offering As A Reward (Success Fee / Contingent Fee)   20% Of Amount Recovered AUTOMATIC CALCULATIONS Potential Return Of Investors (Percent)   500 Estimated Total Reward Offered To Investors   $1,000,000.00 Estimated Remaining Compensation For Litigant   $4,000,000.00 Role   Litigant

---

 

International arbitration case analysis is provided to Invest4Justice by the lawyers of the International Arbitration Attorney Network. All other legal advice is provided by Aceris Law LLC.

Estimated 500% Returns: SEC COVER-UP EXPOSED

Compensation for an unjustified guardianship against a victim of harassment

Start a new activity and income as investor.

Victim of an unjustified guardianship in a case of aggravated harassment, it has been terminated only after six years in spite of a court decision and has completely destroyed my life. I am crowdfunding my case with Invest4justice.com, in order to finance my claim for compensation against the State. I have excellent chances of success, because of the strengthened responsibility of the State in trusteeships to repair any damage.

You find further information on the site: https://invest4justice.com/campaigns/. Look for my case under 1 August and the title of this post.

Share this post, invest in my case and others, contact me via this site,

I can show you clever ways to become a “pro” in your new activity and source of income. Together we can get a new start. Until soon, Mary.

Mary Dessing submitted this post on 08/05/2016.

You can contact Mary Dessing privately at https://www.invest4justice.com/members/Mary Dessing/profile

Sign up for Invest4Justice today!

International arbitration case analysis is provided to Invest4Justice by the lawyers of the International Arbitration Attorney Network. All other legal advice is provided by the Aceris law firm.

Compensation for an unjustified guardianship against a victim of harassment

Estimated 397.51% Returns: Compensation for an unjustified guardianship against a victim of harassment of harassment

Description Of Legal Dispute

ENGLISH. I have been badly harassed for many years. Upon an unfounded denunciation by culprits, an unjustified guardianship has been ordered against me, the victim (I have been temporarily stripped of my civil rights). It was based on an incomplete expert report, without carrying out relevant tests, in spite of the evidence that I was sane and capable of managing my affairs.

Two private expert reports became available few months later, based on psychological tests, contesting this guardianship. Then the Supreme court decided that I could request the termination of this guardianship, on the basis of these two reports and of my critics of the decision of guardianship. But it took the State six more years to finally do so. I am now asking for a compensation.

I’m an economist, former university professor. I have seen my life destroyed, in particular my professional activities.

This is a well-documented and clear case of abuse of power, of an institution intended for the protection of people, not for destroying their lives. This case has therefore excellent chances of success, since there is a subsidiary and strengthened responsibility of the State in trusteeships to repair any damage.

It is also an opportunity to bring progress in the handling of cases of harassment and in the defense of human rights.

Details can be found in the documents posted on the site, in particular the Petition.

My Lawyer, Guy ZWAHLEN, member of the Swiss and Geneva Bar Associations and of my legal team, is happy to answer questions.

Thank you for investing in my case. Together we will succeed. Mary Dessing

Username   Mary Dessing E-mail Address Associated With Campaign   mdessing60@gmail.com Country Where Your Dispute Is Located   Switzerland How Much Litigation Funding Do You Want To Raise?   $50,000.00 Headline For Your Litigation Crowdfunding Campaign   Compensation for an unjustified guardianship against a victim of harassment of harassment Description Of Your Legal Dispute   ENGLISH. I have been badly harassed for many years. Upon an unfounded denunciation by culprits, an unjustified guardianship has been ordered against me, the victim (I have been temporarily stripped of my civil rights). It was based on an incomplete expert report, without carrying out relevant tests, in spite of the evidence that I was sane and capable of managing my affairs. Two private expert reports became available few months later, based on psychological tests, contesting this guardianship. Then the Supreme court decided that I could request the termination of this guardianship, on the basis of these two reports and of my critics of the decision of guardianship. But it took the State six more years to finally do so. I am now asking for a compensation. I’m an economist, former university professor. I have seen my life destroyed, in particular my professional activities. This is a well-documented and clear case of abuse of power, of an institution intended for the protection of people, not for destroying their lives. This case has therefore excellent chances of success, since there is a subsidiary and strengthened responsibility of the State in trusteeships to repair any damage. It is also an opportunity to bring progress in the handling of cases of harassment and in the defense of human rights. Details can be found in the documents posted on the site, in particular the Petition. My Lawyer, Guy ZWAHLEN, member of the Swiss and Geneva Bar Associations and of my legal team, is happy to answer questions. Thank you for investing in my case. Together we will succeed. Mary Dessing Featured Image For Your Litigation Funding Campaign   End Date Of Your Litigation Crowdfunding Campaign   2016-10-31 How Much Compensation Can You Receive If Your Case Wins?   $3,975,141.42 Percentage Of Future Potential Compensation You Are Offering As A Reward (Success Fee / Contingent Fee)   5% Of Amount Recovered AUTOMATIC CALCULATIONS Potential Return Of Investors (Percent)   397.51 Estimated Total Reward Offered To Investors   $198,757.07 Estimated Remaining Compensation For Litigant   $3,776,384.35 Litigation Crowdfunding Campaign Author   Mary Dessing Role   Litigant

---

 

International arbitration case analysis is provided to Invest4Justice by the lawyers of the International Arbitration Attorney Network. All other legal advice is provided by Aceris Law LLC.

Estimated 397.51% Returns: Compensation for an unjustified guardianship against a victim of harassment of harassment