Return of $1.00 per $1 : Need Pledges Now--a campaign against government corruption

Description Of Legal Dispute

Hi everybody,

My name is Pat and I am the founding father of an Oregon Business Trust which is a small construction company in the State of Oregon. This campaign is on behalf of the company and is an attempt to raise funding to continue litigation in defense of the company’s license before the Construction Contractors Board (CCB).

The company’s license is subject to revocation through a legal proceeding before a powerful state administrative agency, the CCB. The company’s license is crucial to the survival of the company as it authorizes the company to provide construction services in the State of Oregon and provides a means of revenue for the company and income for the company’s associates and employees.

Unfortunately, the company has been targeted by government officials in retaliation for my personal and irrelevant activities as a civil rights activist.

Government officials using their positions within powerful state administrative agencies initiated the unlawful action to revoke the company’s contractor’s license based on retaliatory false, fabricated, misleading, and speculative evidence without performing a proper and mandatory investigation regards the integrity of the evidence.

The attorney’s for the CCB therein identified an omission of due process protections for the company’s business entity type during the proceedings. The attorney’s on behalf of the CCB have taken advantage of this procedural defect by imposing hostile and discriminatory applications of law resulting in the disruption of the company’s business activities, extraordinarily high legal expenses, the company being unable to afford to continue to pay for an attorney, and most recently a ruling by the judge that the company would lose by default unless the company was represented by an attorney.

Thus, with the company facing imminent default without council: the company is attempting to raise the funds to pay for an attorney or the company will likely default in the proceedings, lose it’s license to provide construction services in the State of Oregon, and be subjected to heavily imposed fines; all while not even being provided a just, lawful, and legitimate opportunity to answer to the allegations in the first place.

Notably, despite petitions to the CCB requesting corrective action by the CCB to insure that the company is provided due process of law in the proceedings the CCB’s attorney’s continue to lobby the CCB through various questions of law regarding whether the agency should, or if the CCB has the authority to, correct the hostile and discriminatory applications of the law, despite the severe prejudice, unlawful persecution, and extraordinary damages the company has suffered and shall continue to suffer if these omissions are not corrected.

The law on the company’s side is, among others, the corporate personhood doctrine which is rooted in the U.S. Supreme Courts’ case law by and through it’s interpretation of the U.S Constitution. This historical body of case law limits unlawful government interference, intrusion, and persecution of corporations pursuant to contract and privacy clauses, and otherwise guarantees corporations (or other associations such as an Oregon Business Trust) the protections of the due process of law and equal protection of law clauses of the U.S. Constitution.

The company and its associates ask you take a stance and support our cause:

1) so that the company can afford an attorney and have the allegations against the company adjudicated consistent with the constitutional and procedural protections that the company and its associates are entitled to, AND,

2) to force the CCB to take corrective action by ceasing and desisting in the imposition of hostile and discriminatory applications of the law to contractors and their company’s in the state of Oregon,

Due to the nature of the proceedings there is a moderate to low chance that attorney fees or damages can be recovered at this stage of litigation, however, if attorney fees can be recovered then the funds will be distributed to the investors on a dollar for dollar basis. If the company is successful and their is a basis in law to recover damages through additional litigation each and every investor of this cause will be provided the opportunity to invest in the litigation for damages.

If you are a resident or contractor in the state of Oregon, Then you are urged to pledge in order to prevent the hostile and discriminatory applications of law at the expense of residents and contractors in this state.

If you are a tea party member or have strong beliefs about the maintaining the integrity of our constitution then again you are urged pledge in order to uphold the constitution before administrative agencies like the CCB.

The company has spent almost the entirety of it’s profits over the last eight months paying for attorney’s fees. The combined resources of the company and it’s associates cannot cover the pending expense of counsel at this time. As a small start up company any pledge that can be made would be greatly appreciated and not forgotten.

Thank you for your consideration and hope to see a pledge from you or your organization.

Pat

Country Where Your Dispute Is Located   United States How Much Litigation Funding Do You Need?   $25,000.00 Headline For Your Litigation Crowdfunding Campaign   Need Pledges Now–a campaign against government corruption Description Of Your Legal Dispute   Hi everybody, My name is Pat and I am the founding father of an Oregon Business Trust which is a small construction company in the State of Oregon. This campaign is on behalf of the company and is an attempt to raise funding to continue litigation in defense of the company's license before the Construction Contractors Board (CCB). The company's license is subject to revocation through a legal proceeding before a powerful state administrative agency, the CCB. The company's license is crucial to the survival of the company as it authorizes the company to provide construction services in the State of Oregon and provides a means of revenue for the company and income for the company's associates and employees. Unfortunately, the company has been targeted by government officials in retaliation for my personal and irrelevant activities as a civil rights activist. Government officials using their positions within powerful state administrative agencies initiated the unlawful action to revoke the company's contractor's license based on retaliatory false, fabricated, misleading, and speculative evidence without performing a proper and mandatory investigation regards the integrity of the evidence. The attorney's for the CCB therein identified an omission of due process protections for the company's business entity type during the proceedings. The attorney's on behalf of the CCB have taken advantage of this procedural defect by imposing hostile and discriminatory applications of law resulting in the disruption of the company's business activities, extraordinarily high legal expenses, the company being unable to afford to continue to pay for an attorney, and most recently a ruling by the judge that the company would lose by default unless the company was represented by an attorney. Thus, with the company facing imminent default without council: the company is attempting to raise the funds to pay for an attorney or the company will likely default in the proceedings, lose it's license to provide construction services in the State of Oregon, and be subjected to heavily imposed fines; all while not even being provided a just, lawful, and legitimate opportunity to answer to the allegations in the first place. Notably, despite petitions to the CCB requesting corrective action by the CCB to insure that the company is provided due process of law in the proceedings the CCB's attorney's continue to lobby the CCB through various questions of law regarding whether the agency should, or if the CCB has the authority to, correct the hostile and discriminatory applications of the law, despite the severe prejudice, unlawful persecution, and extraordinary damages the company has suffered and shall continue to suffer if these omissions are not corrected. The law on the company's side is, among others, the corporate personhood doctrine which is rooted in the U.S. Supreme Courts' case law by and through it's interpretation of the U.S Constitution. This historical body of case law limits unlawful government interference, intrusion, and persecution of corporations pursuant to contract and privacy clauses, and otherwise guarantees corporations (or other associations such as an Oregon Business Trust) the protections of the due process of law and equal protection of law clauses of the U.S. Constitution. The company and its associates ask you take a stance and support our cause: 1) so that the company can afford an attorney and have the allegations against the company adjudicated consistent with the constitutional and procedural protections that the company and its associates are entitled to, AND, 2) to force the CCB to take corrective action by ceasing and desisting in the imposition of hostile and discriminatory applications of the law to contractors and their company's in the state of Oregon, Due to the nature of the proceedings there is a moderate to low chance that attorney fees or damages can be recovered at this stage of litigation, however, if attorney fees can be recovered then the funds will be distributed to the investors on a dollar for dollar basis. If the company is successful and their is a basis in law to recover damages through additional litigation each and every investor of this cause will be provided the opportunity to invest in the litigation for damages. If you are a resident or contractor in the state of Oregon, Then you are urged to pledge in order to prevent the hostile and discriminatory applications of law at the expense of residents and contractors in this state. If you are a tea party member or have strong beliefs about the maintaining the integrity of our constitution then again you are urged pledge in order to uphold the constitution before administrative agencies like the CCB. The company has spent almost the entirety of it's profits over the last eight months paying for attorney's fees. The combined resources of the company and it's associates cannot cover the pending expense of counsel at this time. As a small start up company any pledge that can be made would be greatly appreciated and not forgotten. Thank you for your consideration and hope to see a pledge from you or your organization. Pat Featured Image For Your Litigation Funding Campaign   End Date Of Your Litigation Crowdfunding Campaign   2016-05-10 How Much Compensation Can You Receive If Your Case Wins?   $41,800.00 Percentage Of Future Potential Compensation You Are Offering As A Reward (Contingent Fee)   60% Of Amount Recovered AUTOMATIC CALCULATIONS Estimated Returns Of Investors Per Dollar Funded   $1.00 Estimated Total Reward Offered   $25,080.00 Do You Need A Lawyer?   Yes, I need a lawyer Litigation Crowdfunding Campaign Author   patkoontz

---

 

International arbitration case analysis is provided to Invest4Justice by the lawyers of the International Arbitration Attorney Network. All other legal advice is provided by Aceris Law LLC.

Return of $1.00 per $1 : Need Pledges Now--a campaign against government corruption